On Thursday, we had a very strong showing in the debate co-sponsored by the Dupont Circle Citizens Association and Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2B, which was moderated by Davis Kennedy of The Current Newspapers. There was an outpouring of support at the debate, which highlighted key differences between my opponent and me.
Focus. I an running to be a true Ward Councilmember, committed to working on quality of life and public interest issues – from restoring library services, rejuvenating schools and public parks, and improving public safety. My opponent made little mention of such issues during the debates.
Tax relief. I will focus tax relief on small businesses and long-time residents who have experienced a steep rise in property taxes. My opponent supports across-the-board cuts that would favor big businesses over those who need help.
Quality of life. For example, I strongly support placing reasonable limits on daytime noise, while my opponent voted to strip the noise bill of its effectiveness.
Fiscal responsibility. My opponent has saddled District residents with the highest per capita debt in the nation due to his sponsorship of hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate giveaways. His failed oversight has allowed scandals in the DC Office of Tax and Revenue. Yet, he continues to discuss more publicly-financed stadiums and earmarks.
You can read reaction to the debate on the Penn Quarter Living, OffSeventh,
and Washington CityPaper blogs. The Washington Post also wrote about the race today.
Over the past several weeks, I’ve gone door-to-door in every neighborhood in Ward 2. I recently met voters in Georgetown with Tom Pursley, who served for many years as president of the Dent Place Association. We continue to receive a very positive and warm response. That’s why community leaders and activists from across the ward in every neighborhood have endorsed my candidacy.
Onward to September 9!
Posted in Supporting Local Businesses, Schools & Education, Financial Undersight, Noise, Neighborhoods, Parks
